U. K. Cigdem Et Al. , "A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk," REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA , vol.67, no.5, pp.468-471, 2017
Cigdem, U. K. Et Al. 2017. A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA , vol.67, no.5 , 468-471.
Cigdem, U. K., Sevinc, S., Esef, B., Sureyya, O., Muzaffer, G., & Akif, D., (2017). A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA , vol.67, no.5, 468-471.
Cigdem, Unal Et Al. "A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk," REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA , vol.67, no.5, 468-471, 2017
Cigdem, Unal K. Et Al. "A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk." REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA , vol.67, no.5, pp.468-471, 2017
Cigdem, U. K. Et Al. (2017) . "A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk." REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA , vol.67, no.5, pp.468-471.
@article{article, author={Unal Kantekin Cigdem Et Al. }, title={A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk}, journal={REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA}, year=2017, pages={468-471} }