Comparison of Safety and Efficiency of General, Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia Methods Used for the Endoscopic Surgical Treatment of Ureteral Stones: Which One is Better To Access The Ureter and Reach The Stone?

Oztekin U., CANİKLİOĞLU M., ATAÇ F., Kantekin C. U., Gurel A., IŞIKAY L.

UROLOGY JOURNAL, vol.17, no.3, pp.237-242, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 17 Issue: 3
  • Publication Date: 2020
  • Doi Number: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5638
  • Journal Name: UROLOGY JOURNAL
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Page Numbers: pp.237-242
  • Keywords: anesthesia methods, endoscopy, epidural anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, ureteral stone, ureterorenoscopy, RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY, PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY, LOCAL-ANESTHESIA, COMPLICATIONS, SEDATION, EFFICACY, PATIENT, CALCULI
  • Yozgat Bozok University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of anesthesia methods on the success of urethral access and stone access achievement in endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis.