Evaluating remote healthcare practices: Experiences and recommendations of healthcare professionals on smart applications


Baştürk F., Tokat A. O., Öztürk O., Kader Ç., Işıkay L.

Digital Health, sa.11, ss.1-29, 2025 (SCI-Expanded)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1177/20552076251315786
  • Dergi Adı: Digital Health
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-29
  • Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: With the digitalization of objects and spaces, healthcare services are being reshaped globally, creating many

potential applications. This study aimed to determine the application potential of remote healthcare services (RHS) in a hospital

by considering the experiences, interests, and suggestions of health professionals, and examples of useful applications

that can be used, developed, or invented for healthcare systems.

Methods: A semi-structured, face-to-face interview survey was conducted with 176 healthcare professionals working at

Bozok University.

Results: Branches with the highest practice experience were internal medicine, cardiac, pediatric, infection, and orthopedics.

Experienced participants rated the usability of “Consultation,” “Support,” and “Monitoring” applications higher than other

apps, and indicated that they would prefer to use them for themselves (η²≤0.12). Requirements adequacy was lower for

older adults, internal/surgical branches, and physicians than for other groups (η²≥0.05). Application categories showed

a significant relationship (0.4 ≤r≤0.8, p < 0.05). Several variables significantly explained the models (p < 0.001): application-

usability (64%), user-demand (64%), and requirements-adequacy (25%). Professionals’ demand (r =0.83) was more

strongly correlated to usability than patient demand (r =0.63). Health professionals (N =105) from 17 branches provided

57 available, 51 developable, and 19 innovative application recommendations. These were coded according to application

type, critical features, presence, integration status, and usefulness.

Conclusion: RHS’ application potential in a hospital was revealed considering demographic factors and application categories

based on health professionals’ experiences, practical interests, and suggestions, with a strong, comprehensive, and upto-

date methodology. The findings have the potential for international application and can contribute to implementing useful

and developing original applications.