Do the etiological factors in artificial urinary sphincter reimplantation cases affect success and complications ?


Creative Commons License

NALBANT İ., Tuygun C., Ozturk U., Goktug H. N. G. , Karakoyunlu A. N. , SELMİ V., ...More

TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol.48, no.6, pp.1263-1267, 2018 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 48 Issue: 6
  • Publication Date: 2018
  • Doi Number: 10.3906/sag-1805-150
  • Journal Name: TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Page Numbers: pp.1263-1267
  • Yozgat Bozok University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Background/aim: The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is still one of the best options for incontinence treatment. It may also have an advantage for revision or reimplantation in the management of complications. In this study we aimed to discuss the etiological factors for AUS reimplantation and effects of these etiological factors on success rates, patient satisfaction rates, tune to reimplantation surgery, and complications.