TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, cilt.48, sa.6, ss.1263-1267, 2018 (SCI-Expanded)
Background/aim: The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is still one of the best options for incontinence treatment. It may also have an advantage for revision or reimplantation in the management of complications. In this study we aimed to discuss the etiological factors for AUS reimplantation and effects of these etiological factors on success rates, patient satisfaction rates, tune to reimplantation surgery, and complications.