Do the etiological factors in artificial urinary sphincter reimplantation cases affect success and complications ?


Creative Commons License

NALBANT İ., Tuygun C., Ozturk U., Goktug H. N. G., Karakoyunlu A. N., SELMİ V., ...Daha Fazla

TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, cilt.48, sa.6, ss.1263-1267, 2018 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 48 Sayı: 6
  • Basım Tarihi: 2018
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3906/sag-1805-150
  • Dergi Adı: TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1263-1267
  • Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background/aim: The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is still one of the best options for incontinence treatment. It may also have an advantage for revision or reimplantation in the management of complications. In this study we aimed to discuss the etiological factors for AUS reimplantation and effects of these etiological factors on success rates, patient satisfaction rates, tune to reimplantation surgery, and complications.