Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
19th Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust, PST 2022, Fredericton, Kanada, 22 - 24 Ağustos 2022
The spread of digital disinformation (aka "fake news") is arguably one of the most significant threats on the Internet today which can cause individual and societal harm of large scales. The susceptibility to fake news attacks hinges on whether or not Internet users perceive a fake news article/snippet to be legitimate (real) after reading it. In this paper, we attempt to garner an in-depth understanding of users' susceptibility to text-centric fake news attacks via a neuro-cognitive methodology (thus corroborating as well as extending the traditional behavioral-only approach in significant ways). In particular, we investigate the neural underpinnings relevant to fake vs. real news through EEG, a well-established brainimaging technique. We design and run an EEG experiment with human users to pursue a thorough investigation of users' perception and cognitive processing of fake vs. real news. We analyze the neural activity associated with the fake vs. real news detection task for different categories of news articles. Our results show that there may be no statistically significant or automatically inferable differences in the way the human brain processes the fake vs. real news, while marked differences are observed when people are subject to (real or fake) news vs. resting state and even between some different categories of fake news. This neurocognitive finding may help to justify users' susceptibility to fake news attacks, as also confirmed from the behavioral analysis. In other words, the fake news articles may seem almost indistinguishable from the real news articles in both behavioral and neural domains. Our work serves to dissect the fundamental neural phenomena underlying fake news attacks and explains users' susceptibility to these attacks through the limits of human biology. We believe that this could be a notable insight for the researchers and practitioners suggesting that the human detection of fake news might be ineffective, which may also have an adverse impact on the design of automated detection approaches that crucially rely upon human labeling of text articles for building training models.